Tuesday, July 10, 2012

The Spanish 'Dream Team'


Sunday’s Spanish triumph over Italy in the final of Euro 2012  marks their third major international soccer tournament victory in a row.  Not only did they raise their third consecutive major trophy (Euro 2008 and World Cup 2010) and set unprecedented marks for international soccer, they cemented their place as the greatest team in international sports history, and possibly sports history in general.
Most Americans, on the heels of the impeccably produced Dream Team documentary will cry foul, and state that there are none better than our American heroes of the 1992 Barcelona Olympics.  The two  teams are quite similar in many respects, however,  in the major differences between the teams lies the case for why the Spanish dominance in the world’s game and international sports history is more impressive.
First, the similarities, starting with the All-Star team effect.  The Dream Team of 1992 was essentially an NBA All-Star team built to compete against the world and showAmerican dominance in a sport we invented.  It had players at various points in their careers, but there was little questioning that they were the best collection of American basketball players.  The Spanish team is similar, a team built almost entirely of players from powerhouses Real Madrid and Barcelona.  Of the 11 Spanish starters, only one applies their trade outside of the two Spanish giants.
Another striking similarity is how easily the world domination was made to look, with each opponent looking pedestrian at best.  The Dream Team won every game of the 1992 Olympics by over 30 points, Spain only lost 1 game in 19 over their 4 year dominance, capping it off with a 4-0 dismantling of Italy in which Andrea Pirlo’s hair didn’t lose one bit of shape or volume.  Spain only conceded one goal in their march to Euro 2012 glory.  Both teams were head and shoulders above any competition.
The dominance of the two teams against their rest of the world cannot be argued.  When looking at the differences between the two teams, however, we see why Spain’s dominance is more impressive.  The first difference can be considered the rosters of the two teams.   The Dream Team was playing a sport their nation invented, and of the 12 on the roster, 11 of them (all save the single amateur Christian Laettner) were better than any other player in the entire tournament, most would even be Hall of Fame inductees.  They had the 11 best basketball players on the world, on one team.  The Spanish team, despite their All-Star team nature and unquestionable dominance, does not have either of the two best players in the world on their team.  Lionel Messi, Barcelona teammate of 6 Spanish starters, plays for Argentina, and Cristiano Ronaldo, Real Madrid teammate of 4 Spanish starters, was part of the Portuguese side that Spain knocked out in the Semi-Finals.  Spain’s collection of talent is unprecedented, but unlike the Dream Team, there was still a good bit of residual talent among the competition.
The second major difference between the teams is Spain’s unmatched longevity.  The Dream Team was a one-off, never to be seen again event.  This is part of the allure that I appreciate as much as any American should.  That team could have more than likely won subsequent Olympic and World Championships, but the fact is, they didn’t. Spain did.  A Spanish team captained by Iker Casillas through 4 years and 3 major tournaments did.  As previously stated, they only lost 1 game in that 19-game stretch (a fluke 1-0 opening group game loss to Switzerland).  In fact, the only other Spanish loss in a competitive fixture since 2008 came to the United States in the 2009 Confederations Cup (America wins in the end!).  Just two losses in 42 games, over a stretch of 4 years.
The American national basketball team changes for each tournament it is in, players who are injured don’t make the rosters, and new All-Stars replace them.  In the eight years following the Dram Team this system worked fairly successfully, but eventually the team began underachieving dramatically, despite still having many of the best players on the planet on the team.  Over the past 4 years and 3 tournaments,  Spain has consistently used the same players for this unmatchable run.  Of the Euro 2012 Final starters, eight of them also started the 2010 World Cup Final, and seven started the Euro 2008 Final.  Had it not been for injuries to Barcelona duo Carles Puyol, who also has great hair, and David Villa, those numbers would surely stand at ten and eight, respectively.  This group of players has been nearly untouchable for 4 years, and almost every one of them figures to be back for World Cup 2014 in Brazil.
Spanish players and soccer players in general would give anything to play for their national team, as international glory is the pinnacle of their sport, despite the pay being fractions of what they make for their clubs.  Modern NBA All-Stars do not share this sentiment and at the 1996 Olympics, hosted at home in Atlanta, only 5 of the Dream Team were back to compete again.  This 1996 team dominated, with an average margin of victory of 31.6 points, but that was where the domination ended and players will to participate diminished.  At the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, the Americans narrowly won gold (though Vince Carter did this), and in 2004, they only managed a Bronze.  The Spanish players are giving up their summer holidays to compete for their country, regardless of the pay, because of national pride.  The NBA All-Stars have recently been dropping out of the Olympics to rest as opposed to working hard to prepare for them.  This disproportionate passion, I believe, directly translates to the citizens of the respective countries.
Lastly, and probably most important, is the outpouring of emotion and international passion involved in the Spanish victory as opposed to the 1992 Dream Team.  The Olympics are a massive worldwide event, and the Dream Team headlined the 1992 Olympics, without question.  However, basketball is a game cherished by us Americans and a few select areas of Europe.  Soccer, World Cups, and European Championships are loved and watched by the world.  When the Dream Team won gold, they were expected to, and there was very little celebration involved.  For us Americans, it was a confirmation of our prowess at a sport we created and an always welcome but not infrequent showcase of supreme dominance.  Despite being the reigning champions and World Cup holders, the emotion of the world and specifically the Spanish nation in support of La Roja and their victory was overwhelming.  This emotion and passion is unmatched across any other domestic or international sport.
With their dynasty cemented, the Spanish journey will be one to watch in two-years’ time in South America, as a roster made up of likely these same invincibles will again look to march to another major tournament championship.  Maybe then, despite my feelings of their superiority already, can I make the appeal to Americans that Spain is indeed a larger dynasty than the 1960s Boston Celtics or 1990s Chicago Bulls (GASP).
Additionally, the Spanish win because they have more attractive wives and girlfriends (eg. Shakira). Let’s all just hope Sergio Ramos doesn’t do this again.
Stanton Coville is a former UChicago soccer player and an SEO Analyst in Chicago, as well as a regular contributor.  Stanton can be reached at his website or on Twitter.

Friday, June 29, 2012

Pitching Pilots for 2015

We have, by my evaluations, been in somewhat of a golden age of television recently.  Even as the business model evolves due to the rise of internet streaming and DVRs changing when we watch shows and whether we see commercials at all, advertising still supports some terrific shows on network and basic cable, and the premium channels (HBO and Showtime) continue to churn out thoughtful dramas and outrageous comedy.  As I think about it more and more though, this era may be coming to an end, as some terrific shows have been underwatched to the point of nearly being cancelled (Community and Parks and Rec), or have run their planned course or run out of new material and will be ending soon (Breaking Bad, Mad Men, and 30 Rock).

As we have seen in Hollywood, the easiest solution to creating a  hit movie or tv show is to take an established brand and squeeze every last dollar out of it until it is a shell of what it once was (see: Transformers or Pirates of the Caribbean).  This may be becoming the trend in tv as well, as networks are beginning to reboot shows from the past like Dallas and the upcoming remake of The Munsters.  Sometimes it can be hard to think of ways to reboot a show, so naturally I’m here to pitch some shows that not only would be good for the fall pilot season, but one or two for the summer schedule as well.  Rather than lazily rehash plot of the original, I also propose simply only stealing the brand name and developing an entirely new show from it.  Below are just a few ideas:

Thursday, May 24, 2012

GIRLS: BECAUSE EVERYONE ELSE HAS DISCUSSED IT, WE WILL TOO (Part 2)

As epsiode 3 came and went, our discussion of GIRLS may have been at its peak. We decided to pay homage to Shoshanna’s earnest assessment of her own “Sex and the City” character match in Episode 1 by playing the same game with GIRLS. (Side note: if this were the Sex and the City game, Carolanne would totes be Carrie with a touch of Miranda, and Matt is def Samantha with a bit of Charlotte’s country club aesthetic). Anyway, this game would prove difficult with GIRLS, mostly because by this point none of the characters were particularly redeemable. They were all still slightly absurd embodiments of some real life (probably atypical) situations and relationships, but as individuals didn’t feel well rounded or grounded in any discernible pasts (which, obviously, as viewers we knew nothing about yet). And to further complicate this vain attempt at locating ourselves in these irritating fictitious beings, the one of us who is not a GIRL was left with an even bleaker set of abysmally portrayed male characters.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

GIRLS: BECAUSE EVERYONE ELSE HAS DISCUSSED IT, WE WILL TOO (Part 1)

Most often on the internet and in print, TV shows are evaluated episode to episode, and if done on Twitter, minute to minute. Typically a writer is assigned to a particular show because of his or her background - maybe a distinct knowledge that would help in evaluating the program, such as having read the source material (good for a show like Game of Thrones), or because they have worked on writing a high-minded concept show (which should be required to evaluate Community).  Conveniently, we have no background in evaluating a show like GIRLS (the show’s caps lock button appears broken, so ours will break for unity’s sake) unless you count growing up in Manhattan and New Jersey (i.e. near brooklyn) and the fact that half of the analysis comes from a GIRL.  This will not stop us from analyzing, don't worry.

Friday, April 6, 2012

My Current Fascination with Disney World

For the past 4 months or so, and once or twice while still in college, I’ve probably mentioned my strong desire to go back to Disney World. Usually when I mention this I immediately get a strange look, because no 23 year old man should really want to go to Disney World.  Disney World is intended to be enjoyed by kids, and tangentially by adults who bring them.
So, as a result of getting the strange looks, I’ve tried to reflect on why I actually want to go back to Disney World without kids, and below is what I came up with.

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

The Best Show You're Not Watching Today: Battleground

Tuesday is a largely vacant spot in my week night tv watching.  Almost every other night has at least one show, if not 4, I could tell you that I’d be watching if at home on my couch.  The problem with Tuesday is that there aren’t any quality scripted shows to really watch on tv.  New Girl isn’t bad, but it’s hardly must watch; no one is going to ask you at work if you saw New Girl last night, Zooey Deschannel is just that sort of person, memorably forgettable.  To be fair, Tuesday also has extremely popular shows like Dancing With the Stars and American Idol, but I will not watch those unless forcibly tied down.  The great thing about this dearth of quality programming, until 11pm that is, because The Daily Show is always quality, is that I’ve discovered the best show that doesn’t air on tv, but does become available on Tuesdays.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Book Review: Don't Put Me in Coach

Mark Titus is the winningest basketball player in Ohio State history.  The catch: he played in only 32 games for 48 minutes and scored just 9 points.  He rode the Buckeye bench to an NIT Championship, a Sweet Sixteen, and a National Championship game.  In other words, he has my, as well as many other decently athletic young adults, dream college experience.  His book, Don’t Put Me In, Coach, chronicles this four year journey, and the time he spent with five future NBA players.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Previewing: The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games releases this weekend, and since it will be the first blockbuster of the season barring massive refund requests, I figure it should be previewed based on my limited knowledge.  The movie is, like everything in Hollywood, an adaptation of something else; in this case the popular novel of the same name.  Based on personal experience, the book is third in popularity behind the Harry Potter series (which is fantastic) and Twilight (which is not fantastic and would be the first thing I would bring to a Fahrenheit 451 book burning). Click through to see why I feel you should see this hopefully quality movie.

Burger Bars: Not a Fading Fad

For many in the restaurant world, the emergence of the ‘Burger Bar’ is just a fad.  Personally, the Burger Bar has absolutely no relation to the negative connotation of the word ‘fad’.  It is by far my favorite restaurant genre, and you can measure your value to me based on whether or not I have taken you to my personal favorite, DMK Burger Bar (I am near the top of their ‘Frequent Fryer Club’, where the top prize is a cholesterol test kit… a terrible omen for my heart, but that is currently less important). The concept is overwhelmingly successful and here to stay.  The reasons are national, social, economical, and gastronomical.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Reviewed: 21 Jump Street


21 Jump Street, which took first place at the box office this past weekend, is a movie I wholeheartedly recommend to everyone other than your grandparents.  It has some terrific gut busting moments and, unlike many Adam Sandler movies that make a ton of money but suck, is genuinely funny and deserves your money. Who’d have guessed Channing Tatum could actually be in a movie I liked? Weird.

Friday, January 20, 2012

A Homer Preview: Giants vs. 49ers

In a trigger happy league, and even more so conference, the NFC championship comes down to two teams more famous for their defenses and running attacks in recent years.  So who will be the victor come Sunday? Well let me break it down as to why and how the Giants will win.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Versus: Guts and Legends of the Hidden Temple

Nostalgia is a powerful feeling. In hindsight everything is clearer, except for probably things you revered as a child but haven't revisited recently.  Growing up, Nickelodeon was a powerhouse of a television channel with cartoons like Doug, Hey Arnold!, and Rocket Power.  It also had many great live game shows as well.

Legends of the Hidden Temple and Guts were two physical game shows they had, complete with obstacle courses and awesome prizes like Nintendos and trips to Space Camp.  If you were a kid with even a small interest in athletics, these shows were what you wanted to be on, especially because you always felt you could do way better than the foolishly inept contestants that sometimes were featured.  My question is which was better, both as a show and as a contestant.

Catching Up on Christmas Movies: Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

On Christmas Day The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo was released nationwide, and despite being a best-selling book, the hard R movie finished 4th at the box office behind the Chipmunks (really America?), Sherlock Holmes 2, and the fantastic Mission Impossible 4.  This movie has a lot going for it, with David Fincher (The Social Network) directing, Steve Zaillian an Oscar winner for Schindler's List, and starring Daniel Craig (Quantum of Solace) among others.  The first trailer is among the best in recent memory, and it's opening credits are even more impressive.  So did the movie live up to the expectations created by the book, production crew, and early visuals?

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Pop Up Video

This weekend, or some morning, it's hard to remember anymore, I was flipping through tv channels looking for something to watch.  This fact alone makes me think it was the weekend. If I can't find something to watch on tv, and the internet isn't an option, it's only because I've exhausted it, and I only exhaust the internet on the weekend.